Where the mind is without fear

Menu
  • The writer in me…
Menu

The science behind “fair & lovely”

Posted on December 13, 2010 by Accidental Writer

Nanopolitan points me to this link, which to me is indicative of a much deeper bias against dark skin. The Department of Science and Technology, in collaboration with Procter and Gamble has launched the December challenge inviting scientists to come up with skin-whitening solutions more effective than hydroquinone.

To me, the very fact that the Department of Science and Technology of the Government of India is willing to invest money and energy in research to “Equal or better efficacy in reducing facial hyper-pigmented spots or lighten basal skin color tone vs. 2% hydroquinone without notable side effects (e.g., irritation),” is indicative of a deep-seated bias against dark skin and a belief that darkness, pigmentation or tanning are undesirable. While I completely understand research to find effective cures for skin diseases and disorders such as leukoderma, eczemas and acne, I simply do not understand the obvious government sanction for finding ways to make your skin whiter.

I do agree that hyperpigmentation can lead to skin disorders and medical problems sometimes, but from my experience, most young men and women use products such as “Fair & Lovely” just because of the perception that white equals beautiful. I thought that by now, it was a well-established fact that the melanine protects skin from several skin problems and even cancer. Frankly, I would rather be dark and healthy than fair and acne-ridden. I have wheatish skin myself and have never found that to be a handicap. As Abi says at the Nanopolitan, the irony is sometimes too much to take.

What message are we sending out to our children? That only fair is beautiful and that anything less than that is unacceptable? Let’s not get into this fair and lovely trap. Let’s not give something as superficial and irrelevant as skin colour so much importance that a government-sponsored award is given to research on skin-whitening.

Category: Society and Institutions

3 thoughts on “The science behind “fair & lovely””

  1. Jessie says:
    December 15, 2010 at 11:05 pm

    “Fair is beautiful”, is a misconception taken seriously by the younger generation. The Department of Science and Technology should not encourage such researches. This misconception starts when a baby is born. First, people are keen in knowing the gender, then if its a girl the immediate question is about the complexion of the baby. Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder and definitely not based on just being fair complexioned.

    Reply
  2. selvan says:
    December 16, 2010 at 5:20 am

    It is said that the first reaction of the Africans was to ridicule and make fun of the whites foe the color of their skin.The power of the gun powder and their military superiority gave the white man the edge.During the Apartheid days the Africaners gave the Chinese ‘honorary white’ status.Due to the Chinese belief in their belonging to the ‘Middle Kingdom’and the europeans being devils the chinese are said to have remained indifferent to what the foreign devils felt about them.Unfortunately for the Indians having been defeated repeatedly by fair skinned ‘Milechas’ white skin has acquired a natural superiority in the minds of the natives.

    Reply
  3. Julie Buz. says:
    December 20, 2010 at 6:31 am

    Oh, my! How ridiculous IS that?! The saddest thing is that I’m sure lots of people will jump to buy the product… sad waste of money. :o/

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

  • July 2025
  • January 2025
  • October 2023
  • October 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • December 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • December 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • April 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • July 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006

Categories

  • Arts
  • Blogging
  • Books
  • Cinema
  • Cuisine
  • Culture
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Fashion
  • Feminism
  • History
  • Humour
  • Language
  • Law
  • Literature
  • Media
  • Personal
  • Poetry
  • Pointless posts
  • Politics
  • Religion
  • Short stories
  • Society and Institutions
  • Tagged!
  • Technology
  • Travel
  • Uncategorized
© 2025 Where the mind is without fear | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme