Where the mind is without fear

Menu
  • The writer in me…
Menu

On cinema

Posted on July 29, 2008 by Accidental Writer

I rarely blog about cinema. I only write if it is worth the effort. The last movie I blogged about was Taare Zameen Par. But today, I wanted to talk about something entirely different. Let’s start with home. The release of the much-hyped Rajnikanth guest-starrer Kuselan is around the corner. I have watched the trailers and teasers on TV. What I find amazing is that Rajnikanth has become such a hyped commodity. For me, what is important is the story. According to reports, Rajnikanth has barely 15 minutes of screen time. But, practically all the teasers feature him to the exclusion of everyone else. This, I find unacceptable. The other actors in the movie are equally accomplished, if not actually better. Take Pasupathy for example. I would rather watch Pasupathy perform as villain than watch Rajnikanth dancing around trees with an 18 year-old heroine. It is galling that actors of the calibre of Pasupathy and Prabhu are being sidelined in favour of the "superstar". I would not watch this movie for Rajnikanth, but I probably will because it veterans like Balachander and Vasu. I am probably going to get brickbats from fans of the superstar. But frankly, I am sick of geriatric heroes running around the trees with heroines less than their daughters’ age. Vijaykanth is probably the worst of the lot. But, Rajnikanth or even Kamal Hassan(I happen to like Kamal’s acting) are no better. Can they please give way to younger, and better-looking heroes?

Now, on to the next. Check out this post. A bit excessive don’t you think? Even worse, the stupid "rule" the author has cited. I got to this link via Confused. And, I quite agree with him. It’s a movie!! I go to a movie to have fun. Yes, once in a while, a movie succeeds in touching my heart or making me think. Like Taare… did. But, that is it. Some people love looking at the world through the prism of feminism. And the result is disastrous at times and ridiculous at others. I am not a feminist. I believe in equality, yes. But I do NOT watch every single movie with feminism on my mind. And if you so dislike pointless characters, you shouldn’t be watching movies anyway. Most movie characters make no sense, male or female.

Category: Cinema

0 thoughts on “On cinema”

  1. Nikhil Narayanan says:
    July 30, 2008 at 12:00 pm

    Amrutha,
    I have seen the original version of Kuselan in Malayalam(Katha parayumbol) and Mammooty would have had just over 15 minutes role in the movie.

    Even though Sreenivasan(actor in Kathaparayumbol) is nowhere near the superstar status like Mammootty, the posters did not have much of Mammooty, because Sreenivasan films are good and very realistic.He can bring ppl to theaters.

    May be the actor who is doing Sreenivasan’s role in the Tamil version, can not bring many people to theaters.And as we all know Rajni can do that!

    May be its a cheap stunt in making in a Rajani movie, but they have to make profits, right?

    -Nikhil

    Reply
  2. Amrutha says:
    July 30, 2008 at 12:52 pm

    Ok…Pasupathy may not be a saleable star. But Prabhu? Was a successful hero in his own right and worked with the likes of Mani Ratnam. what about Vadivelu whose full-length comedy turned out to be a runaway hit? I still think it is nor fair to sideline the others in favour of Rajnikanth.

    Reply
  3. Nikhil Narayanan says:
    August 1, 2008 at 7:24 am

    Amrutha,
    Agreed.But they feel/know Rajni is a better commodity to sell that anyone else, however good they are as actors.
    I just read the review
    http://in.rediff.com/movies/2008/aug/01ssk.htm

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

  • July 2025
  • January 2025
  • October 2023
  • October 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • December 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • December 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • April 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • July 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006

Categories

  • Arts
  • Blogging
  • Books
  • Cinema
  • Cuisine
  • Culture
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Fashion
  • Feminism
  • History
  • Humour
  • Language
  • Law
  • Literature
  • Media
  • Personal
  • Poetry
  • Pointless posts
  • Politics
  • Religion
  • Short stories
  • Society and Institutions
  • Tagged!
  • Technology
  • Travel
  • Uncategorized
© 2025 Where the mind is without fear | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme